Rubybro wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 12:33 pm
I think its fine to reuse fictional settings since the majority of characters in fiction are not omnipotent. Its just that eastern cultures, especially around anime IP's, entirely don't give a shit about adhering to source material in general when it comes to other stories in the same setting. Standalone titles are what I'm talking about with maybe a loose connection or cameo related to the main plot at worst.
This assertion is pretty inaccurate...
If we're looking a difference in creative philosophy between East and West, I would say that one of the bigger differences is that Eastern creators and publishers are willing to let stories end while Western creators and publishers aren't. Long-running manga titles are almost invariably serials, while a long-running comic is almost always episodic. The manga will be a single, unbroken narrative in serial installments that has a well-defined beginning, middle, and end. If it's a multi-part work, each part is its own unbroken serial narrative with a clear beginning, middle, and end. Western comics, on the other hand, tend to be heavily episodic storytelling with a clear beginning but the intention to run
forever with a neverending string of loosely related episodic stories. That only end when the series isn't making enough money and gets cancelled or rebooted.
Rubybro wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 12:33 pm
Its just absurd that you imply that this kind of storytelling diminishes the main overall arc of the fictional universe its a part of. Especially given that marvel does that shit all the time.
Attempting to continue a story that already ended, especially in a way that undermines the meaning and impact of the original ending, is inherently a damaging thing for the story as a whole.
Star Wars is a great example.
Star Wars's original trilogy had a solid happy ending with the destruction of the Death Star II, the death of the Emperor, the redemption of Darth Vader, and peace returning to the galaxy with the fall of the Empire and restoration of the Republic. The decisions necessary to keep the story going ultimately meant that the heroes never got to enjoy much in the way of peace. The Empire wasn't really gone and thus the heroes spent decades futilely fighting the same battles until they were worn down into bitter, miserable husks of their former selves before dying with peace still an unattainable dream.
Better-run franchises tend to have creative teams who recognize that the smartest thing you can do if you're trying to continue a story after an end which wraps up the story so definitively is to put as much distance between yourself and that setting as you reasonably can. Depending on how big the setting is, you go to a completely different place and tell a totally unrelated story that just happens to be in the same setting (e.g.
Macross's sequels) or you put a generation or two's worth of time between your old story and new one so the setting itself can develop in new ways. Milking the same setting over and over with direct sequels just leads to an inevitable crash at the end of diminshing returns like what happened to
Gundam after
Victory or
Star Trek after
Voyager. If you don't put in the effort to keep it fresh, it gets stale. That effort is what you're mistaking for disrespect for the original setting.
Rubybro wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 12:33 pm
Its just that instead of code geass continuing to go forward with the crazy and bizarre Geass culture stuff introduced in R2, they just fell back on fujoshi stuff and fanservice at the cost of everything else.
Bandai Namco are trying to make
Code Geass into a commercially successful franchise like
Gundam... they're aiming for mainstream appeal by trying to build on what made the original work successful like any sensible studio would.
Rubybro wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 12:33 pm
I don't make any sketchy or illegal stuff if that's what you're implying.
Mechatalk is the exception in my experience since most forums that are still around and have a more active userbase, still host images and jannies are more than capable of dealing with any bad actors that you're talking about.
I'm not implying you do, I'm just saying there are people out there who do... and that's why most forums prefer not to let users upload images directly to the site. Some site owners just don't want to deal with the hassle or the risk, and I can respect that.