Don't stop there, Arbiter: Why were they trailblazers?Arbiter GUNDAM wrote:As for Robotech and Power Rangers, those worked precisely because they were the trailblazers.
You can't just dump something new out there and automatically cause a sensation. However they did it, Robotech and Power Rangers were trailblazers because they were popular. They were popular not just because they were new, but because they scratched an itch that nobody else was scratching, i.e. they performed a function, fulfilled a purpose, and did it well. Macross and Zyuranger wouldn't have come anywhere close.
Why is it a terrible idea?Any "Robotech-ifying" beyond 2000 is a terrible idea. If continuity is a problem, then that's just too bad. I can only speak for America; the problem here is we're practically programmed to enjoy long-running shows. For frak's sake Survivor is still on! And what are the popular anime here in the States? Stuff like Naruto, Bleach and One Piece, all long-running shows.
Trying to mess with X to suggest it's some vague sequel to Wing is a big no-no in my book. If people can't get it around their heads that there are individual shows, then that's their loss. If you can't broadcast a show in its relatively original format, at that time or this time, why even bother?
Let me define what I mean by "what works." It works if it gets you ratings and sales, that is, a return-on-investment to make the enterprise worthwhile; it doesn't work if it doesn't. You present an all-or-nothing context and, well, Gundam has followed a more purist path so we're well on our way towards "nothing." Rather than complain about how Americans prefer their television, wouldn't it be more productive to adapt to it?
Personally, I'm a huge fan of the UC continuity, but I recognize that the rest of the States isn't. What I suggest has nothing to do with my personal preferences, but what appears to work. Wing was popular. Is it not a logical suggestion to build upon that success however one can, especially if the Japanese studio is largely insensitive towards these differences in viewership?
Let me be clear: "their loss" becomes the company's loss, which eventually translates into our loss, as we pay $60 per individual, imported Gundam Unicorn episode. Who do you think has the final say, in these matters?
That said, I think you're spot-on here. Anime has become more niche and, in the context of importation, more divorced from American audiences than ever. Not too long ago, I watched an episode of Sasami-san @ Ganbaranai and it made my skin crawl. Ended up driving circles around my city to clear the squick feeling it elicited.But I think when you get right down to it, even if Gundam had been saved by following Wing up with anything other than First Gundam, I'd bet that anime in general would still be where it is right now. Would we have more Gundam DVDs? Maybe, but I'd bet we'd still be paying through the nose for Unicorn and I'd also bet that B.E. would still be dead.
And I collected all 20 volumes of Angel Sanctuary, so I don't think I can rightly be called a "prude."
All of this is hypothetical, as we aren't sliders and can't find alternate (counter)examples. Still, I think it's worth noting that Dragon Ball Z and Studio Ghibli movies (and, I suppose, Naruto and Bleach to far lesser extents) have not been affected by the general collapse of the anime distro business. The general collapse of an overly bloated industry doesn't axiomatically prevent standouts from rising to prominence.
In all honesty, it's probably far too late for Gundam, but that doesn't mean that there aren't lessons to be learned.