I would have to agree with said critics: as much as Gundam's supposed to "show the horrors of war" and all, I personally think its exploitative. As for your other point: perhaps you're right. We have two more episodes coming. Maybe they'll (hopefully) change the remaining storyline completely and screw with Banagher and make him suffer so much, I actually feel sorry for him. So...(drumrun) I 'll give him a chance.Kratos wrote:See, this is interesting, because the pasts of characters like Marida and Angelo has garnered criticism from some as being excessive. Anyways, it doesn't matter to what degree Banagher has suffered; your original point was that he hasn't faced ANY hardship, and that just flat-out isn't true.
-_- Very well then. I'll give you that. He's an "average" teenager.Kratos wrote:First of all, he's 16. At that age, belonging and acceptance are very, very important. Second, it more points to feelings of isolation in general, to a loneliness that would very likely pursue him into adulthood. That's hardship, especially at his age.
It's not what he says, but rather, what he tries to do. But again, like in our first point, I'll stop whining and instead wait for the last two episodes, see what happens.Kratos wrote:Well, you said that his logic was right all the time in your original post. That aside, what he says isn't nonsense, unless you actually want to argue that "killing is bad" and "these wars are pointless" are incorrect positions to take. No, he just doesn't know put his ideals into practice on a place like the battlefield, and as such just does what he feels is expected of him (fight, and surrender himself to the NtD). But he isn't a soldier, and that's not the purpose that the Unicorn was made for, and as such letting himself be used by the power it has is the wrong choice and leads to death. Banagher's development is not in a changing of perspective; instead, it's growing into an understanding of how he can use his perspective to protect the ones he loves.
I'll give you that too.Kratos wrote:See above. He was still going through character development at the time. He's only a hypocrite so long as he uses the Unicorn for violence and destruction.
I will remain in my position. And even if UC doesn't say it as obviously as X did, we still do know, subconsciously, that Newtypes aren't the future. Their dwindling numbers are proof enough.Kratos wrote:Well, no, they're not entirely an illusion in X - Tifa, after all, is very much a true-blue Newtype. But even the fatalistic word on Newtypes that X provides is only one interpretation, and it's not the final word (especially since it's only very tenuously UC). To be honest I'm quite happy that Unicorn is taking the concept seriously. It's a far bigger challenge to to tackle Newtypes than to just dismiss them as freak accidents.
Well, its not like Wesley is shown to be actually right: I mean, Picard does give him a verbal Brightslap (IIRC: my memory sometimes fails me), telling him that he could've caused a huge crisis with the Cardassians. However, I will agree that, unlike Wesley, Banagher didn't have anyone to actually snap him out of his babble and instead tell him to take the most practical, albeit nonlethal, course of action. Picard most likely would've made a battle plan for Riddhe and Banagher to disable the Shamblo, and not kill Loni (which was Banagher's ultimate goal, after all). But what I just said is FanFiction territory, so I'll leave it to rest.Kratos wrote:Yeah, but the difference is that Wesley Crusher is shown to be in the right (if I'm following you criticisms of him, here), whereas the situation at Torrington is made out to be an actual tragedy that, again, is partially Banagher's fault. Had he used the Unicorn's more violent abilities, maybe he could have defeated the Shamblo, but as far as Riddhe was concerned he wasn't seriously trying - and that, ultimately, is what gets Loni killed. Banagher tries to reason with her, but does it in a way that ignores his surroundings and the others present. He's in the wrong, or is at least partially so, and the show portrays him like that. So, no, not Wesley Crusher
Kratos wrote:Spoiler
Is that her death? If so, I will refrain from commenting, as I haven't seen nor read that part of the series.
Spoiler
Yup. She wasn't given a break.
I love these kinds of debates. Makes your brain roll over inside your head to have a civilized, nice conversation with interesting people.